Legal Opinion

Hoppa v. Schermerhorn & Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 17, 1994No. 1-92-3764PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Theis

The defendant, Schermerhorn & Company, appeals from a circuit court order requiring it to turn over $25,000, plus interest and costs, to the plaintiff, Mark Hoppa, to satisfy a default judgment in that same amount entered more than six years ago against J.P. Schermerhorn & Company, now dissolved. Schermerhorn & Company charges that the trial court erred in treating it as the successor corporation to the dissolved company and in ordering it to turn over $25,000 to Hoppa. For the reasons presented below, we affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

This action arises out of an automobile accident…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Upholsterers' International Union Pension Fund v. Artistic Furniture of PontiacCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  2. Nguyen v. Johnson MacHine & Press Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  3. Green v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  4. Bergman & Lefkow Insurance Agency v. Flash Cab Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  5. Sinquefield v. Sears Roebuck and Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ed Peters Jewelry Co. v. C & J Jewelry Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  2. Steel Co. v. Morgan Marshall Industries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  3. Kennedy v. Four Boys Labor Services, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  4. Krol v. Wilcek (In Re H. King & Associates)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
  5. Park v. Townson & Alexander, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API