Peters v. Sturmer
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.
Plaintiff sued defendants Stunner to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been suffered in an automobile collision at Coral Gables, Dade county, Florida, March 3, 1931, by reason of the alleged negligence of the defendants. There was judgment for plaintiff on default, and after the entry of this judgment the Preferred Automobile Insurance Company, garnishee defendant, was served with process, and the questions here presented relate to the validity of the judgment in garnishment. The assignments of error may be divided into four classes:
1. (a) Error in admitting in evidence…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Patterson v. AdanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Pickett v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
- Maxwell v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Douglas v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Emery v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hale v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1956
- Tudryck v. MutchMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
- Wolverine Mutual Motor Ins. v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Dustin v. BeckstrandIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
- Brogdon v. American Automobile Ins.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.