Legal Opinion

(HC) Hollingshead v. Smith

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 29, 2023No. 2:22-cv-01228Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SCOTT HOLLINGSHEAD, No. 2:22-cv-1228 DAD KJN P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER and FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 STEPHEN SMITH,1 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, with an application for writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Respondent filed a motion to dismiss this action because it 19 was filed beyond the one-year statute of limitations ( 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)). The fully briefed 20 motion is now before the court. As discussed below, respondent’s…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Artuz v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API