Legal Opinion

Methvin v. Mutual Savings & Loan Ass'n

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 6, 1937No. 26986PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.

This was an action by the defendant in a mortgage foreclosure suit to vacate a judgment which had formerly been entered in that action foreclosing the mortgage. The present action, to vacate that judgment, was by petition, under section 556, O. S. 1931, 12 Okla. St. Ann., sec. 1031. Also, the defendant’s objection to the confirmation of sale in the mortgage foreclosure action was consolidated with the present petition to vacate the judgment in that action, and both were tried together. The trial judge sustained the plaintiff’s demurrer to the evidence of defendant, and the defendant appeals.

Th…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carlin v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Oklahoma Railway Co. v. HoltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. In Re Estate of BrunerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. Turner v. DexterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Morgan v. Security State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fowler v. GoldfederSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  2. Torosian v. National Capital Bank of WashingtonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1976
  3. Tate v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  4. Kentucky Auto Mechanics Service Co. v. Kentucky Auto Parts Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  5. Norge Gas Corp. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API