Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Frost National Bank

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided October 28, 1992No. 04-92-00079-CVPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARCIA, Justice.

This is an appeal by writ of error from a default judgment. Appellants contend the trial court erred because it lacked jurisdiction to enter the default judgment. The trial court did not have in personam jurisdiction. We reverse the judgment and remand.

On March 29, 1985, appellants, Richard Barnes and Lyda Barnes, non-residents of Texas, executed and delivered to North Frost Bank, appellee, a promissory note in the amount of $66,150.00, along with deed of trust securing the note. Based on a default of the note, appellee initiated foreclosure proceedings, with a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. McKanna v. EdgarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Uvalde Country Club v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Stubbs v. StubbsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Capitol Brick, Inc. v. Fleming Manufacturing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Leedo Cabinetry v. James Sales & Distribution, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  2. Jackson v. Biotectronics, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
  3. GMR Gymnastics Sales, Inc. v. WalzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  4. West Columbia National Bank v. Griffith, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
  5. Zuyus v. No'Mis Communications, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1996

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API