Legal Opinion

GMR Gymnastics Sales, Inc. v. Walz

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 27, 2003No. 2-02-155-CVPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOHN CAYCE, Chief Justice.

This is a restricted appeal from a $4 million default judgment attacking the validity of service of process against a nonresident defendant. In seven issues, GMR Gymnastics Sales, Inc. (“GMR”) complains that the service of process was defective and the trial court abused its discretion by failing to grant GMR’s motion for new trial. We will reverse the default judgment and remand the case for trial.

Michael Walz was a student gymnast at Eagle Mountain-Saginaw Independent School District. While doing swings on the high bars, the gymnastics grips he was wearing…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Peralta v. Heights Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Primate Construction, Inc. v. SilverTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Wilson v. DunnTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Norman Communications v. Texas Eastman Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
  5. McKanna v. EdgarTexas Supreme Court · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. AEP Engineering & Consulting, Inc. D/B/A Texas Conveyors v. SICK, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2010
  2. AEP Engineering & Consulting, Inc. D/B/A Texas Conveyors v. SICK, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2010
  3. AEP Engineering & Consulting, Inc. D/B/A Texas Conveyors v. SICK, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2010
  4. Acadian Properties Austin, LLC v. Kjmonte Investments, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2021
  5. Billy Lee Burgin v. the Frost National Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2010

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API