Legal Opinion

Tommy G. Shead v. Donald L. Quatsoe, Muriel Douglas Black v. Wilbur Schmidt

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 24, 1973No. 72-1830, 72-1849PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Each petitioner claims that the failure to appoint counsel to represent him at his parole revocation hearing deprived him of due process. The district court denied both petitions for habeas corpus. While the appeals were pending here, the Supreme Court considered the question whether counsel must be appointed in such hearings. Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778, 93 S.Ct. 1756, 36 L.Ed.2d 656. The question we must now decide is the extent to which Scarpelli applies retroactively.

In Scarpelli the Supreme Court reversed our holding in Gunsolus v. Gagnon, 454 F.2d 416 (1971), that due process…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Gunsolus v. GagnonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  4. Frank Zizzo v. United States of America, and James Traeger, United States MarshalCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cresci v. SchmidtDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1976
  2. Sillman v. SchmidtDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1975
  3. Johnson v. MathewsDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API