Tommy G. Shead v. Donald L. Quatsoe, Muriel Douglas Black v. Wilbur Schmidt
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Per curiam
Each petitioner claims that the failure to appoint counsel to represent him at his parole revocation hearing deprived him of due process. The district court denied both petitions for habeas corpus. While the appeals were pending here, the Supreme Court considered the question whether counsel must be appointed in such hearings. Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778, 93 S.Ct. 1756, 36 L.Ed.2d 656. The question we must now decide is the extent to which Scarpelli applies retroactively.
In Scarpelli the Supreme Court reversed our holding in Gunsolus v. Gagnon, 454 F.2d 416 (1971), that due process…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Gunsolus v. GagnonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- Frank Zizzo v. United States of America, and James Traeger, United States MarshalCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cresci v. SchmidtDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1976
- Sillman v. SchmidtDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1975
- Johnson v. MathewsDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1977