Legal Opinion
Cresci v. Schmidt
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided November 15, 1976No. Civ. A. 75-C-32PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
REYNOLDS, Chief Judge.
This is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in which the petitioner alleges that the revocation of his parole was arbitrary and capricious, and that he possessed a constitutional right to the assistance of retained counsel at the revocation hearing. The threshold issue of mootness having been decided in favor of the petitioner by the decision and order of this court of November 25, 1975, 403 F.Supp. 348, the petition is now before the court on its merits. Jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C. § 2241. For the reasons hereinafter stated, the petition is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Robert Muller Taylor v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- State Ex Rel. Cresci v. H&SS DEPARTMENTWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Taylor v. State of MinnesotaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. EvansWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Cresci v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Van Ermen v. PercyDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1980
- Cresci v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. EvansWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977