Legal Opinion

Snyder v. Bunnell

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided November 11, 1886PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtCoxe, J.

The defendants are charged with infringement of letters patent No. 103,383, granted to James P. Snyder for an improvement in electro-magnetic burglar-alarm apparatus. The invention "consists in an arrangement for setting in action automatically a secondary circuit, which will continue the alarm, although the circuit first sot in action may be suddenly stopped again by the shutting of the door or window.” The claim is as follows:

“A'n alarm indicator, arranged for automatically causing a secondary and independent circuit at the indicators by the action of the armature lever with a disk or other…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cotton-Tie Co. v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Wallace v. HolmesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1871

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. McConnellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Tennessee · 1897
  2. Goodyear Shoe Machinery Co. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1901
  3. Bullock Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
  4. Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Kelsey Electric Railway Specialty Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1896
  5. Davis v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API