Miller v. Miller

TURGEON, J,

Currently before the court is obligee Stacy Miller’s de novo appeal from an April 20, 2004 child support order. She argues that her ex-husband, the obligor Joel Miller, should be (1) required to contribute to her mortgage payment through his child support obligation, as required under Rule 1910.16-6(e) of the Pennsylvania Support Guidelines and Isralsky v. Isralsky, 824 A.2d 1178 (Pa. Super. 2003). Alternatively, she argues she is otherwise entitled to the adjustment (2) under the terms of the parties’ marital settlement agreement or (3) because she is entitled to an upward…