Legal Opinion

Harris v. Harlan

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1860PublishedCited by 15 opinions

APPEAL from the Grant Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHanna, J.

Harris, as assignee, sued Harlan, as assignor, of a promissory note, averring that at the time the note became due, the maker thereof was insolvent, &c.

Harlan answered, first, in denial; second, that the note, which was for 100 dollars, was, together with a mortgage to secure the payment thereof, given for a part of the purchase-money of certain real estate; that the same was of the value of 300 dollars, and was so mortgaged.

P'he plaintiff replied, admitting that the note and mortgage were so executed, but averring that there was another note for a part of the purchase-money, for 125 dollars,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Crouse v. HolmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Jewett v. TomlinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Hawes v. ChailleIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Richardson v. McKimSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  5. Wilson v. HunterIndiana Supreme Court · 1868

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API