Legal Opinion · Dissent

Frank v. City of Akron

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 9, 2002No. Nos. 00-3050, 00-3070Published

1Dissent

DISSENT FROM DENIAL OF REHEARING EN BANC

BOGGS, Circuit Judge.

Under the First Amendment, citizens have very broad rights to attempt to persuade their neighbors of the correctness of social and political propositions, and even to attempt to advance those views by supporting the election of candidates to public office. While cases such as Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1, 96 S.Ct. 612, 46 L.Ed.2d 659 (1976), and Nixon v. Shrink Mo. Gov’t PAC, 528 U.S. 377, 120 S.Ct. 897, 145 L.Ed.2d 886 (2000), have indicated that those rights can be restricted, it can only be done after careful scrutiny of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Claiborne Hardware Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. McIntyre v. Ohio Elections CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Bates v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government PACSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API