Legal Opinion

Hodson v. Grumlich

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided May 17, 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWecht, J.

The corporation counsel is suing the defendant Rose E. Grumlich under the authority of sections 125 and 128 of the Public Welfare Law. It appears that relief was granted to the defendant’s mother in the sum of $540 from October 1, 1931, to March 1, 1933, and to the defendant’s father in the sum of $510 from October 1, 1931, to February 1, 1933.

*200It also appears that the defendant’s mother during her lifetime had a bank account in trust for the defendant. That after the death of the defendant’s mother, the proceeds of the said account, in the sum of $1,836, were paid over to the said defendant.…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tolley v. MaliswaskiNew York Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Hodson v. MarksCity of New York Municipal Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API