Legal Opinion
Tolley v. Maliswaski
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 21, 1936PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPersonius, J.
At the close of the plaintiff’s evidence the defendant moved for a dismissal of the complaint and a nonsuit; at the close of all of the evidence the defendant and the plaintiff each moved for a directed verdict. Decision of these motions was reserved by consent. The jury rendered a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $1,275. The defendant moved to set aside this verdict and for a new trial. Decision was again reserved and briefs submitted.
The action is brought under section 128 of the Public Welfare Law which provides: “ A public welfare official may bring action against a person…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Albany v. . McNamaraNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- In re the Estate of BlackNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Estate of CarrollNew York Surrogate's Court · 1907
- Hodson v. GrumlichCity of New York Municipal Court · 1935
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Estate of KasnerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
- In re the Accounting of MorrisseyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1944
- In re the Accounting of SaundersNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951
- In re the Estate of BeningasoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
- Department of Welfare v. HaleckyNew York Family Court · 1948