Ewing v. Cargill, Inc.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT H. Dudley, Justice.
Appellant Donald Ewing filed this defamation suit against Cargill, Inc., and, upon trial, the jury found that Ewing was not defamed. The trial court entered a judgment accordingly, and Ewing appeals. We affirm the judgment.
The facts leading to the alleged defamation are as follows. Donald Ewing and his brother, Dr. Douglass Ewing, entered the poultry business in 1979, as the operators of Ewing Farms, a partnership, and Ewing Enterprises, Inc. They purchased feed grain from Cargill, Inc. In 1980 and 1981, the Ewing brothers failed to pay Cargill for the feed. Cargill,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- A. D. Luster, A's Fishhouses, Inc. v. Retail Credit CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
- Mikel v. HubbardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Reese v. HaywoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
- Studdard v. TrucksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1877
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United Insurance Co. of America v. MurphySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Minor v. FaillaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Cinnamon Valley Resort v. EMAC Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
- United Insurance Co. of America v. MurphySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998