Doran v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Chief Justice Schaffer,
Plaintiff was injured when the automobile he owned and was driving was struck on a public crossing by a two-car electric freight train operated by both defendants. The jury awarded plaintiff $30,000. The court entered judgment on the verdict. Defendants appeal.
Appellants raise the contention, in making the claim, that plaintiff was contributorily negligent and that judgment should be entered in their favor, that he left a place of safety and assumed a dangerous position on the tracks. We think, when the evidence is taken as a whole, and when thus focused…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Weschler v. Buffalo & Lake Erie Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Sexauer v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Mackey v. Philadelphia & West Chester Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Murphy v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Barth v. Lackawanna & Wyoming Valley R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Libengood v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Koren v. GeorgeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Graff v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
- Grotefend v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Grotefend v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.