Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 28, 1927No. Appeal, 133PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

Appellee, a passenger, was injured in a collision between two of appellant’s trains. No defense was offered and the only contest was the amount of compensation to be paid. The verdict was for $35,000, but a most casual review of the record will show that it cannot be supported.

When the collision occurred, on August 28, 1924, appellee was standing in the train. The shock caused her to fall, her head striking an obstruction, causing unconsciousness. When she was taken to the hospital, Dr. Hays, the physician in charge, made an examination. The patient showed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holden v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  2. Gail v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Ralston v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tauber v. WilkinsburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Libengood v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Doran v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Nicholson v. FeagleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Nickolls v. Personal Finance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API