Legal Opinion
Wittke v. Kusel
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided July 17, 1974No. 47,353PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court is delivered by
Fontron, J.:
This action is in the nature of an inverse condemnation. The plaintiffs are Sophia and Frank W. Wittke. The defendants are Smith County, Kansas, and the individual members of the Board of County Commissioners of that county. They will collectively be referred to either as the county or as defendants.
The Wittkes own a twenty acre tract of land described as the North Half (N %) of the Southeast Quarter (SE K) of the Northeast Quarter (NEK) of Section Twelve (12), Township Five (5) South, Range Fourteen (14) West of the Sixth (6fh) Principal…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brock v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
- Cohen v. St. Louis, Fort Scott & Wichita RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
- State Highway Commission v. PuskarichSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Dugger v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
- Hubbard v. Spring River Power Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lone Star Industries, Inc. v. Secretary of the Kansas Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- Ventures in Property I v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
- Mid-America Pipeline Co. v. Lario Enters., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Mid Gulf, Inc. v. BishopDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1992
- Hiji v. City of GarnettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.