Canino v. Bleau (In Re Canino)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OLLASON, Bankruptcy Judge:
OVERVIEW
Debtor claimed exemptions for full equity in a vehicle and residence that facially exceeded the statutory exemptions. The bankruptcy trustee did not file an objection to the claimed exemptions within the statutorily prescribed period. Prior to the expiration of the time for the trustee to object to the claimed exemptions, the trustee sold the vehicle and paid Debtor the allowed exemption under California law. After the trustee sold the residence, he moved the court for an order to turn over the proceeds to the estate, minus the allowed homestead…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Norwest Bank Worthington v. AhlersSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Watt v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Arnold v. Gill (In Re Arnold)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Eskanos & Adler, P.C. v. Roman (In Re Roman)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Heintz v. Carey (In Re Heintz)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Spenler v. Siegel (In Re Spenler)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Towers v. Boyd (In Re Boyd)District Court, N.D. California · 2000
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.