Spenler v. Siegel (In Re Spenler)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JONES, Bankruptcy Judge.
On October 30, 1995, following the conclusion of the 341(a) meeting, the chapter 7 2 trustee filed an “Objection to the Two Individual Retirement Accounts Claimed as Exempt by Debtor; and Request for Order Authorizing Objection to Proceed as a Contested Matter” (the “objection”). In response the debtor filed a motion to deny the objection claiming that the trustee’s objection did not conform to the local rules. At the hearing on the debtor’s motion, the bankruptcy court denied the debtor’s motion and deemed the trustee’s objection to be a motion for an extension…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Morgan v. Federal Deposit Insurance (In Re Morgan)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- In the Matter of Herman Neil YOUNG, Debtor. Herman Neil YOUNG, Appellant, v. David v. ADLER, Trustee, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Eastman v. Eastman (In Re Eastman)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Cisneros v. Kim (In Re Kim)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Gonzales v. Davis (In Re Davis)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Towers v. Boyd (In Re Boyd)District Court, N.D. California · 2000
- Adam Lee v. Dane FieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- In Re BetzUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.