Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports
1Opinion of the Court
- ..~, 1 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN Overrded lly-~ ent Sam F. Pat;tmev.Conch CO. Ixstr1ctc I one 0 co. -c-J Honorable 3. Y. Busmere Oount~r Attommy Charolue Q6Untv Rurk, Toxar otr rtiatotl, and ion or thlr Dqmrtment 6 been reoe~vd. eta, upon whlah you Lnion an hereinaitrr rokee Gounty, upon order of J and regularly adrer0iswl oertain roa& raehinery for Slur warrant6 In part pwment therefor. No purehasea were +%I on January 28, 1941 for Oomml~~lonerti* Pro¬e Nos. 2:anb 4, beoauso thegommierionrrr of those preoinats etated to the coup'6 at that tlae that they di6 not…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rue v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1888
- Mullins v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1916
- National Hollow Brake Beam Co. v. Interchangeable Brake Beam Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1897
- Grimes v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1888