National Hollow Brake Beam Co. v. Interchangeable Brake Beam Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri
These were two suits in equity for infringement of a patent, the first being brought by the National Hollow Brake Beam Company and the Chicago Bailway Equipment Company jointly, and the second by the last-named company alone, against the Interchangeable Brake Beam Company. The causes were heard together on exceptions to the answers of the defendant.
1Opinion of the Court
ADAMS, District Judge.
These two causes are submitted on exceptions to the answers of the defendant. These exceptions raise substantially the same questions, and may properly be considered together. The hills allege that the complainants are the owners of certain patents particularly described; that such patents are valid, and have been infringed by the defendant. The bill in No. 4,047 is for relief and discovery, and propounds to the defendant three interrogatories, as follows:
“(1) Whether, prior to the filing of this bill, and subsequent to December 8, 1892, the defendant, Interchangeable…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- The State of Rhode Island v. the State of MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
- Hughes v. BlakeSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Colgate v. Compagnie Francaise du Telegraphs de Paris a New YorkU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1885
- Gamewell Fire-Alarm Tel. Co. v. MayorU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1887
- Whittemore v. PattenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1897
3Cited by7 opinions
- Johnson v. MundySupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
- Elmore v. Maryland & Virginia Milk Producers Ass'nSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
- Tillinghast v. ChaceU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1903
- Keller v. StraussU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1898
- Calahan v. Holland-Cook Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.