Kissam v. Marshall
New York Supreme Court
Motion to vacate attachment.
1Opinion of the CourtLeonard, J.
—The defendant moves to vacate an attachment granted against him as a non-resident debtor, for irregularity.
Several objections are alleged, but only two are entitled to any consideration :
1. The warrant has not been signed by the attorney.
2. The undertaking therefor is in the sum of $200 when section 230 of the Code requires an undertaking in at least $250, before the warrant shall issue.
The first defect is clearly amendable.* The second one is of a more serious character.
On first impression, it seemed a fatal failure to give jurisdiction to the court.
There are, however, several adjudged…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hawley v. BatesNew York Supreme Court · 1839
- Potter v. BakerNew York Court of Chancery · 1834
- Whaling v. ShalesNew York Supreme Court · 1839
- Ex parte ChryslinNew York Supreme Court · 1825
- Beach v. Southworth & LitchfieldNew York Supreme Court · 1849
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bell v. MoranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Mather v. HannaurNew York Supreme Court · 1878
- Golden Valley County v. CurtinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
- Bondy v. CollierCity of New York Municipal Court · 1895
- Heilner v. WalshThe Superior Court of New York City · 1881
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.