Legal Opinion

Kissam v. Marshall

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1860PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Motion to vacate attachment.

1Opinion of the CourtLeonard, J.

—The defendant moves to vacate an attachment granted against him as a non-resident debtor, for irregularity.

Several objections are alleged, but only two are entitled to any consideration :

1. The warrant has not been signed by the attorney.

2. The undertaking therefor is in the sum of $200 when section 230 of the Code requires an undertaking in at least $250, before the warrant shall issue.

The first defect is clearly amendable.* The second one is of a more serious character.

On first impression, it seemed a fatal failure to give jurisdiction to the court.

There are, however, several adjudged…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hawley v. BatesNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  2. Potter v. BakerNew York Court of Chancery · 1834
  3. Whaling v. ShalesNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  4. Ex parte ChryslinNew York Supreme Court · 1825
  5. Beach v. Southworth & LitchfieldNew York Supreme Court · 1849

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bell v. MoranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  2. Mather v. HannaurNew York Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Golden Valley County v. CurtinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Bondy v. CollierCity of New York Municipal Court · 1895
  5. Heilner v. WalshThe Superior Court of New York City · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API