Legal Opinion

McCarthy v. Tedisco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 26, 1991PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

— Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Doran, J.), entered February 7, 1991 in Schenectady County, which dismissed the complaint for, inter alia, failure to exhaust administrative remedies.

Since the time that plaintiff filed his notice of appeal, defendant James N. Tedisco has submitted an affidavit agreeing to change the symbol he uses in his campaign literature. Because this effectively grants plaintiff the relief he requested in the complaint, i.e., to enjoin Tedisco from using his current campaign symbol, this appeal has been rendered moot (see, Matter of Herald Co. v O’Brien, 149…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Herald Co. v. O'BrienAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Beyah v. LeFevreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tottey v. VarvayanisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API