Legal Opinion

Shopmen’s Local No. 502 Pension Plan, et al. v. Pencoyd Iron Works, Inc., et al.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 4, 2026No. 2:25-cv-03411Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SHOPMEN’S LOCAL NO. 502 : CIVIL ACTION PENSION PLAN, et al. : : v. : : PENCOYD IRON WORKS, INC., : NO. 25-3411 et al. : MEMORANDUM Bartle, J. June 4, 2026 Plaintiffs Shopmen’s Local No. 502 Pension Plan and its Trustees have sued the defendants to recover payments for withdrawal liability under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”),

29 U.S.C. §§ 1132

and 1145, and the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980 (“MPPAA”),

29 U.S.C. §§ 1399

and 1451. The gist of the first Amended Complaint is that in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  5. Mortensen v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API