Legal Opinion

In Re Silica Products Liability Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided June 19, 2006No. 04-0606PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court 1

ON REVIEW BY THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · SmithJustice B.A. Smith

including Justice PEEPLES, Justice LANG, Justice HANKS, and Judge

ABLES. 1

John B. Lopez sued his former employer GlobalSantaFe Corporation under the Jones Act, alleging that he sustained injuries resulting from exposure to asbestos and silica present on the ship where he was employed. See 46 U.S.C. 688 (Supp. 2005). State and federal courts have concurrent jurisdiction over claims brought under the Jones Act. See Stier v. Reading & Bates Corp., 992 S.W.2d 423, 429 (Tex.1999). Lopez’s case was filed on July 22, 2003, in the 55th…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Horizon/CMS Healthcare Corporation v. AuldTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. Lakeshore Utility Company, Inc., Sentry Title Company, Inc., Alan D. Whatley, and Thelma J. WhatleyTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Stier v. Reading & Bates Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Lufkin v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Teacher Retirement System of Texas v. CottrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Toyota Unintended Acceleration LitigationTexas Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API