Legal Opinion

Collins v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 8, 1920No. 9939PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Plaintiff in error was convicted of the larceny of a saddle. On Application for Supersedeas. Error to the District Court of El Paso County, Hon. Arthur Cornforth, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Allen

The plaintiff in error, defendant below, was convicted of larceny. He has sued out a writ of error, and the cause is before us upon his application for a supersedeas.

The information to which the defendant pleaded and upon which the trial was begun, charged the defendant with the larceny of “the personal goods and chattels of Mrs. C. C. Hamlin, to-wit, three saddles.”

At the trial, the first witness for the people was Mrs. C. C. Hamlin, the person whose property was alleged to have been stolen. She testified that four saddles were stolen from a garage, one belonging to Mrs. Gunnell, one to Mr.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. . BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
  2. State v. BrightSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. St. Louis v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  2. White v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  3. Diebold v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
  4. Dill v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933
  5. Maraggos v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API