Legal Opinion

People v. Dugger

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 26, 1968No. Docket 4,747PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant’s jury trial on a charge of breaking and entering a building with intent to commit larceny, CL 1918, § 750.110, as amended by PA 1961, No 133 (Stat Ann 1968 Cum Supp § 28.305), resulted in his conviction. He was sentenced and he appeals.

Defendant’s first assertion of error is that the required intent was not proved. A review of the record discloses facts and circumstances from which the intent could readily be inferred. This is sufficient. People v. Griffin (1889), 77 Mich 585.

Defendant next contends that the failure of the trial court to instruct on the lesser included offense of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. GriffinMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. People v. Earnest ThomasMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. AbernathyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. People v. BrownMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. People v. ChronisterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. People v. MooreMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. People v. CoxMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API