People v. Cox

The defendant appeals from a non-jury conviction of the offense of larceny in a building.* The people move to affirm. GCR 1963, 817.5(3).

Defendant’s first claim is that the people failed to make a specific showing of intent. There was sufficient evidence in this case upon which an inference of intent could be based. People v. Dugger (1968), 14 Mich App 270; People v. Gollman (1966), 3 Mich App 463; People v. Clark (1967), 6 Mich App 526.

Defendant also claims that admission of the two men’s suits alleged to have been stolen was improper for the reason that the suits were identified at trial by…