Legal Opinion

Beattie v. Dimitry

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 25, 1929No. 29013PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.

This is a summary proceeding for adjusting and taxing costs in accordance with the decree of this court rendered on October 5, 1926, in the consolidated cases of Beattie et al. v. Dimitry et al. and Schneidau v. Beattie et al. See 162 La. 571, 110 So. 759. The plaintiffs are the three attorneys for the heirs of Mrs. Marion Beattie, and the defendants and reconveners are Charles Schneidau and the heirs of Mrs. Florence A. Toombs. Plaintiffs claim as the subrogees and assignees of their clients. Defendants resist their claim on the ground that they acquired no' enforceable rights from Mrs.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beattie v. DimitrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  2. Succession of ToombsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kommer ex rel. Kommer v. AssenheimerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. In re Certain St. Bernard Parish Government Computer Disks v. St. Bernard Parish Government ex rel. PonsteinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Gasway v. Cellxion, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Green v. JamesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API