State v. Haycock
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.
The defendant, Walter Haycock, was convicted of being a felon having control of a firearm in violation of RSA 159:3 after a jury trial in the Superior Court (Nadeau, J.). The defendant appeals his conviction on the ground that the State presented insufficient evidence for a rational trier of fact to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant exercised control over a firearm. We agree with the defendant and therefore reverse.
On July 20,1990, the defendant called the police to 42 North Main Street in Farmington to report a disturbance. The Farmington Police Department is located…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- State v. PikeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
- State v. CobbSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. HammellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- State v. BissonnetteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- State v. FoxSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- State v. TarantinoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- State v. SharonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993