Legal Opinion

State v. Haycock

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 20, 1992No. 91-323PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.

The defendant, Walter Haycock, was convicted of being a felon having control of a firearm in violation of RSA 159:3 after a jury trial in the Superior Court (Nadeau, J.). The defendant appeals his conviction on the ground that the State presented insufficient evidence for a rational trier of fact to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant exercised control over a firearm. We agree with the defendant and therefore reverse.

On July 20,1990, the defendant called the police to 42 North Main Street in Farmington to report a disturbance. The Farmington Police Department is located…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  2. State v. PikeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  3. State v. CobbSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HammellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  2. State v. BissonnetteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  3. State v. FoxSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  4. State v. TarantinoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  5. State v. SharonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API