Legal Opinion

Resilient Floor Covering Pension Fund v. Floor Covering Contracts

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 2, 2020No. 3:20-cv-03577Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 RESILIENT FLOOR COVERING Case No. 20-cv-03577-EMC PENSION FUND, et al., 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ 9 MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT v. 10 Docket No. 17 FLOOR COVERING CONTRACTS, 11 Defendant. 12 13 14 Plaintiffs are the Resilient Floor Covering Pension Fund and its Board of Trustees. They 15 have filed suit against Defendant Floor Covering Contracts (“FCC”), a sole proprietorship, 16 seeking to collect delinquent withdrawal liability. Currently pending before the Court is 17 Plaintiffs’ motion for a default…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  3. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. RA Gray & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Burton SlotkyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  5. Milwaukee Brewery Workers' Pension Plan v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API