Jurzak v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtFOSTjER, J.
The first count of the indictment charged that defendant, while acting as an agent of Steve Despod, embezzled ox* fraudulently converted to her own use money to “about the amount” of $250, which came into her possession by virtue of her employment.
The second count charged embezzlement to “about the amount” of $50. The third count charged grand larceny.
The evidence of the state was directed to showing that the defendant acted as agent for Steve Despod for the purpose of purchasing certain real estate, that he sent money to her for this purpose, that she failed to purchase the property and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lang v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Huffman v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
- Fuller v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nicholson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
- McGee v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
- Bauer v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1933