Legal Opinion

Bauer v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 1933No. 6 Div. 101PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

The indictment preferred against appellant contained two counts. The court, however, charged out the second count, and the case was given to the jury on the first count only. That count charged, omitting formal parts, that George D. Bauer, being at the time an officer, to wit, vice president of E. P. Allen & Co., Inc., a corporation embezzled or fraudulently converted to his own use money to about the amount of $2,162.55, which came into his possession as such officer, etc. The indictment, so far as this count is concerned, is substantially in Code form, and is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Carr v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  2. Pollock v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  3. Hendrix v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Butler v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Pollock v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Enzor v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Airhart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  3. Kersh v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1933
  4. Christison v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  5. People v. AllenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API