Disabled in Action of Pennsylvania v. Pierce
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
FULLAM, Judge.
The essence of plaintiffs’ complaint is that on January 7, 1985, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) moved into new local quarters at 105 S. 7th Street in Philadelphia (“The Liberty Square Building”); according to plaintiffs, the newly renovated structure does not comply with federal requirements for access to the handicapped.
Defendants are the Secretary of HUD, the Administrator of this HUD region (Region III), the Acting Administrator of the General Services Administration (GSA), and the Region III GSA Administrator.
Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Alexander v. ChoateSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Smith v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. DarroneSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- George A. Lloyd and Janet B. Wolfe, Etc. v. The Regional Transportation Authority and the Chicago Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Lindy Pen Company, Inc., and Blackfeet Plastics, Inc. v. Bic Pen CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BrownCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- EASTERN PARALYZED VETERANS OF PA. v. SykesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988