Bishop v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
PBEHDEBGAST, Presiding Judge.
Under article 1249, Penal Code, appellant was prosecuted and convicted for knowingly permitting his cow to run at large after the stock law had been adopted prohibiting this. He waived a jury and was tried before the court on an agreed statement of facts.
Shortly prior to the August Term, 1913, of the Commissioners Court of Colorado County, fifty-eight qualified voters in a certain territory of said county, petitioned said court to order an election in that certain designated portion of said county specifically described by metes and bounds to determine whether or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Armstrong v. Traylor and ElmoreTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- Griffin v. TuckerTexas Supreme Court · 1909
- Ex Parte HeymanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
- Roberson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901
- Neuvar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lock v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Weaver v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Lambert v. ScurlockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1982
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.