Legal Opinion
Rosenberg v. Yee Chien Woo
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 21, 1971No. 156Published
1Opinion of the Court 1
402 U.S. 49 (1971)
ROSENBERG, DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE
v.
YEE CHIEN WOO.
No. 156.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued February 23, 1971
Decided April 21, 1971
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.
Charles Gordon argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Jerome M. Feit, Beatrice Rosenberg, Paul C. Summitt, and George W. Masterton.
Gordon G. Dale argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.
2Opinion of the Court · BlackJustice Black
Respondent, Yee Chien Woo, is a native of mainland China, a…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Rosenberg v. Yee Chien WooSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Peter Chow Lung Shen v. P. A. Esperdy, as District Director of the Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Yee Chien Woo v. George K. Rosenberg, District Director, Immigration and NaturalizationserviceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Yee Chien Woo v. RosenbergDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1968