Legal Opinion

Yee Chien Woo v. George K. Rosenberg, District Director, Immigration and Naturalizationservice

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 18, 1969No. 24334_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Circuit Judge:

This appeal presents the question whether an alien, otherwise entitled as a refugee to “Seventh Preference” treatment under § 203(a) (7) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 1 may be denied such treatment on the ground that he had become firmly resettled elsewhere and that his entry into the United States was not therefore emergent.

“Aliens, who are subject to the numerical limitations specified in section 1151(a) of this title shall be allotted visas or their conditional entry authorized, as the case may be, as follows:

Jfc iji sfc ^ #(7) Conditional' entries shall…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. United States v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. SUNBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1966

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rosenberg v. Yee Chien WooSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Chinese American Civic Council v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  3. Peter Chow Lung Shen v. P. A. Esperdy, as District Director of the Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  4. Yee Chien Woo v. George K. Rosenberg, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  5. Chinese American Civic Council v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API