Legal Opinion

More v. Miller

California Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1898No. S. F. No. 897PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco; A. A. Sanderson, Judge. Action by H. Clifford More, administrator of Lawrence „ W. More, deceased, against John F. More, administrator of Alexander P. More, deceased. Eliza M. Miller, afterward made special administratrix of Alexander P. More, deceased, and C. A. Baldwin, intervened. From order dismissing complaint in intervention, and from judgment for plaintiff against original defendant, interveners appeal.

Read the full summary

APPEAL from Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco; A. A. Sanderson, Judge. Action by H. Clifford More, administrator of Lawrence „ W. More, deceased, against John F. More, administrator of Alexander P. More, deceased. Eliza M. Miller, afterward made special administratrix of Alexander P. More, deceased, and C. A. Baldwin, intervened. From order dismissing complaint in intervention, and from judgment for plaintiff against original defendant, interveners appeal. From order vacating said judgment, plaintiff appeals. Interveners’ appeal dismissed. Order affirmed on plaintiff’s appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

BELCHER, C.

H. Clifford More, as administrator of the estate of Lawrence W. More, deceased, duly presented to John F. More, as administrator of the estate of Alexander P. More, deceased, a claim for allowance, amounting to the sum of $13,670.14. The claim was at first allowed in part by the administrator and the probate judge, but thereafter the allowance was revoked and recalled by both the admin*79istrator and the judge, and the claim entirely rejected. Thereupon this action was brought to establish the claim, as provided in section 1498 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The defendant…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fox v. Hale & Norcross Silver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  2. National Bank of Troy v. StantonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  3. Stich v. DickinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  4. McCreery v. EverdingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Ewald v. CorbettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Plutus Min. Co. v. Orme, County Com'rs.Utah Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Daniels v. DeanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  3. Pedley v. WerdinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API