Legal Opinion
Steiner v. Wisconsin American Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided June 10, 2004No. 03-1959PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVergeront, J.
¶ 1. In this personal injury action Patricia Steiner alleges that Steiner Corporation owned the resort at which she was injured. The circuit court concluded that Steiner Corporation did not own the resort at the time of her accident and granted summary judgment in favor of Wisconsin American Mutual Insurance Company (WAMIC), Steiner Corporation's insurer. Based on the record of the foreclosure proceeding against Steiner Corporation, the relevant common law, and our construction of Wis. Stat. § 846.30 (2001-02), 1 we agree with the circuit court that Steiner Corporation did not own the resort…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. SetagordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- Strasser v. Transtech Mobile Fleet Service, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- Kallenbach v. Lake Publications, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Groom v. Professionals Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sonday v. Dave Kohel Agency, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Steiner v. Wisconsin American Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Steiner v. Wisconsin American Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005