Legal Opinion
Doe v. C.A.R.S Protection Plus, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 30, 2008No. 06-3625, 06-4508PublishedCited by 308 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.
Jane Doe sued her former employer, C.A.R.S. Protection Plus, Inc. (CARS), alleging employment discrimination based on gender, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. The District Court granted the employer’s motion for summary judgment, finding that Doe had failed to establish a prima facie case of discrimination. We will reverse.
I
We exercise plenary review over the District Court’s grant of summary judgment and apply the same standard, i.e., whether there are any genuine issues of material fact such that a…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by308 opinions
- Millicent Carvalho-Grevious v. Delaware State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Doe v. MeglessCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Deboom v. Raining Rose, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2009
- Lozano v. City of HazletonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Bender v. Norfolk Southern Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
303 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.