Legal Opinion

Brendese v. City of Schenectady

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 7, 1948PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a judgment of the Schenectady Special Term which dismissed plaintiff’s complaint in an action to recover the amount of a deposit made in connection with a bid to perform public work in that city. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Hill, P. J., Foster and Deyo, JJ., concur; Russell, J., dissents, in the following memorandum in which Heffernan, J., concurs: The repeated extensions of time granted to the contractor by the respondents for the purpose of securing a performance bond were a waiver of the laches, and therefore the respondents could not recover liquidated damages. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marcus v. Village of MamaroneckNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Abner M. Harper, Inc. v. City of NewburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Balaban-Gordon Co. v. Brighton Sewer District No. 2Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  2. Alexander v. Village of Tupper LakeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
  3. Frank W. O'Connell, Inc. v. County of BroomeNew York Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Wholesale Service Supply Corp. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API