Legal Opinion

Baker & Hamilton v. Lambert

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 11, 1907No. Civ. No. 348PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. J. C. B. Hebbard, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtCooper, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant, and from an order denying the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.

The complaint contains the common counts, alleging in various forms that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $575.28 for goods, wares and merchandise, sold and delivered by plaintiff to defendant at his special instance and request.

Upon the trial the evidence showed that a partnership had existed between the defendant and one Lipsett. Plaintiff then offered testimony tending to show a sale of the goods and merchandise to the partnership. The defendant…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Robertson v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1821
  2. Mason v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  3. Barry v. FoylesSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  4. Williams v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Ah Tong v. Earle Fruit Co.California Supreme Court · 1896

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Engineering Service Corp. v. Longridge Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. Engineering Etc. Corp. v. Longridge Inv. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Lucy v. LucyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. First National Bank of Dixon v. SpanglerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Chan Yo Chow v. SingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API