Legal Opinion

People v. Ogden

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 8, 1940No. Crim. 3385PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

In an information filed by the district attorney of Los Angeles County defendant was accused in count I of the crime of kidnaping; count II charged the crime of rape; count III a violation of section 286 of the Penal Code, and count IV alleged a violation of section 288a of the same code. Following denial of a motion to set aside the information, and the entry of not guilty pleas to all counts, defendant was tried by a jury which returned verdicts finding him guilty of kidnaping and forcible rape and not guilty of violating sections 286 or 288a of the Penal Code. A motion for a new trial was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. GidneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. State v. NeilIdaho Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Devoy v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Ex parte KeilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. MayberryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. CamdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People v. StanglerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. People v. FloresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. People v. GeorgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API