Legal Opinion
Patterson v. Beall
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 14, 2000No. 92,399Published
1Opinion of the Court
19 P.3d 839 (2000)
2000 OK 92
Jerry PATTERSON, dba Patterson Pest and Weed Control, Plaintiff/Appellant,
v.
Lonnie and Bernice BEALL, Defendants/Appellees.
No. 92,399.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
November 14, 2000.
Justin LaMunyon, Faulkner Law Firm, Enid, OK, for Appellant.
Steven D. Singer, Enid, OK, for Appellees.
BOUDREAU, Justice:
¶ 1 We are presented with two issues on certiorari. First, are summary judgment motions under Rule 13 of the Rules for District Courts of Oklahoma, 12 O.S. (1991), ch. 2, app. (Rule 13), inconsistent with the purpose of the Small Claims Procedure Act, 12 O.S. § 1751 et…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Humphrey v. CadySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Baxstrom v. HeroldSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Reynolds v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.