Legal Opinion

State v. Gill

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 17, 2000No. 1-CA-CV 99-0475PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VOSS, Judge.

¶ 1 Richard Delcid Gill (“appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s order forfeiting $3,636.24 in cash and a cellular telephone to the state. Because we find that the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion to release the property from seizure, we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 Initially, we note that the record before this court is sparse, consisting only of minute entries and instruments in the civil forfeiture action. Although both parties discuss various motions and rulings related to the forfeiture…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ruiz v. HullArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State Compensation Fund v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  3. Lewis v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re 1996 Nissan SentraCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  2. State Ex Rel. Horne v. RivasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  3. In Re $15,379 in U.S. CurrencyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  4. Armenta 191079 v. ShinnDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
  5. In Re $15,379.00 in U.S. CurrencyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API