Legal Opinion

Wright v. Husband

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 21, 1936No. 4-4474PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMehaffy, J.

The appellee, F. L. Husband, filed in the municipal court at Blytheville, an affidavit for a general attachment against C. W. Wright. He alleged that Wright owed him $158.60, and that he was a non-resident of the State. Upon the filing of the affidavit the clerk of the municipal court issued not a general, but a special attachment commanding the officer to attach the property of the defendant, C. W. Wright: “one Ford car, model 1935, coach, motor number 18-2069135.” The officer went to the home of William Wright and Mrs. William Wright, the appellants, attached a car in their garage, although…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wright v. LakeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  2. Rogers v. WilliardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  3. Erwin v. MilliganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  4. Holcomb v. American Surety CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  5. Ball v. Fulton CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1876

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Battle v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  2. Williams v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Ortiz Tejada v. Lewis DenoeTribunal De Apelaciones De Puerto Rico/Court of Appeals of Puerto Rico · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API