Legal Opinion

State v. Klein

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 19, 1909No. Nos. 16,040—(271)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Defendant was charged in the municipal court, of Minneapolis of violating the wineroom ordinance of that city. The case was tried on stipulated facts before Waite, J., who ordered that defendant pay a fine of $25, or in default thereof be imprisoned in the city workhouse not exceeding thirty days. From an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial, he appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

START, O. J.

The defendant was convicted in the municipal court of the city of Minneapolis of the offense of maintaining an inclosure, commonly called a wineroom, within a room covered by his license, for the sale *185of intoxicating liquors therein, contrary to the city ordinance in such case made and provided. He appealed from the judgment, and here seeks a reversal thereof on the ground that the admitted facts in this case do not bring it within any reasonable construction of the ordinance.

The here material facts are to the effect following: The defendant maintains in the city of Minneapolis a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. BargeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  2. State v. McGregorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. LallySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API