State v. Lally
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was convicted in tbe municipal court of Minneapolis, of maintaining a wineroom in violation of the city ordinance. Erom a judgment, Charles L. Smith, J., imposing a fine of twenty-five dollars or imprisonment not to exceed thirty days, defendant appealed:
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The defendant was convicted in the municipal court of the city of Minneapolis of the offense of maintaining and keeping a wineroom, in violation of the ordinance of that city passed April 13, 1900 (Charters and Ordinances of 1905, p. 685), and from the judgment of the court entered thereon appealed to this court, where he contends that upon the admitted facts he was not guilty of a violation of the ordinance.
This ordinance has been several times before this court, and its scope and purpose have been fully determined. State v. Barge, 82 Minn. 256, 84 N. W. 911, 53 L. R. A. 428; State v.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. BargeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- State v. McGregorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- State v. KleinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909