Legal Opinion

In Re Aqua Dots Products Liability Litigation

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 17, 2011No. 10-3847PublishedCited by 142 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge.

Moose Enterprises made, Spin Master distributed, and many retailers sold, Aqua Dots, a toy consisting of small, brightly colored beads that can be fused into designs when sprayed with water. Moose Enterprises contracted production of Aqua Dots to JSSY Ltd., a Chinese company, which substituted 1,4 butanediol for the specified adhesive, 1,5 pentanediol. While the substitute adhesive is chemically similar to 1,5 pentanediol, it came with a drawback. When ingested, 1,4 butanediol metabolizes into gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB), which can induce nausea, dizziness,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Elder v. HollowaySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Clinton v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Erica P. John Fund, Inc. v. Halliburton Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by142 opinions

  1. American Civil Liberties Union of Ill. v. AlvarezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  2. Hilary Remijas v. Neiman Marcus Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  3. John Lewert v. P.F. Chang's China Bistro, IncCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  4. Beaton v. Speedypc SoftwareCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  5. Daniel Greenberg v. Procter & Gamble CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013

137 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API